Investigating marker accuracy in differentiating between university scripts written by students and those produced using ChatGPT

The introduction of OpenAI’s ChatGPT has widely been considered a turning point for assessment in higher education. Whilst we find ourselves on the precipice of a profoundly disruptive technology, generative artificial intelligence (AI) is here to stay. At present, institutions around the world are considering how best to respond to such new and emerging tools, ranging from outright bans to re-evaluating assessment strategies. In evaluating the extent of the problem that these tools pose to the marking of assessments, a study was designed to investigate marker accuracy in differentiating between scripts prepared by students and those produced using generative AI. A survey containing undergraduate reflective writing scripts and postgraduate extended essays was administered to markers at a medical school in Wales, UK. The markers were asked to assess the scripts on writing style and content, and to indicate whether they believed the scripts to have been produced by students or ChatGPT. Of the 34 markers recruited, only 23% and 19% were able to correctly identify the ChatGPT undergraduate and postgraduate scripts, respectively. A significant effect of suspected script authorship was found for script content, X²(4, n=34) = 10.41, p<0.05, suggesting that written content holds clues as to how markers assign authorship. We recommend consideration be given to how generative AI can be responsibly integrated into assessment strategies and expanding our definition of what constitutes academic misconduct in light of this new technology

Combined HPV 16 E2 and L1 methylation predict response to treatment with cidofovir and imiquimod in patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND: Topical cidofovir and imiquimod can effectively treat approximately 55% of patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), thus avoiding the need for surgery. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E⁢2 gene methylation predicts response to treatment but a methylation measurement is only obtainable in approximately 50% of patients. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to determine if the applicability and predictive power of the E⁢2 methylation assay could be improved by combining it with the components of a host and viral DNA methylation panel (S5) that has been found to predict disease progression in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: HPV E2 methylation and S5 classifier score were measured in fresh tissue samples collected pre-treatment from 132 patients with biopsy-proven VIN grade 3 who participated in a multicentre clinical trial and were randomised to treatment with cidofovir or imiquimod. RESULTS: Combining HPV16 E⁢2 and HPV16 L⁢1 methylation provides a biomarker that is both predictive of response to topical treatment and that can produce a clinically applicable result for all patients. Patients with HPV 16 L⁢1

PMPA and PMEA prodrugs for the treatment of HIV infections and human papillomavirus (HPV) associated neoplasia and cancer

The synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of novel phosphonamidate and phosphonodiamidate prodrugs of adefovir and tenofovir are reported. The selected synthetic approach from free phosphonic acid via bis-trimethylsilyl ester intermediates affords (l)-alanine ester derivatives in 10–70% yields. When assessed for their anti-HIV activity, all the prodrugs showed submicromolar activity. Noteworthy, the most potent derivative in the adefovir series contained a 5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphtyl group, herein reported for the first time as an aryl moiety in a ProTide. A pronounced cytostatic activity of the above prodrugs is also reported. Selected compounds were tested for their antiproliferative activity against HPV-transformed cells and they were found significantly more active in comparison to their parent compounds. In this study a slightly improved activity of the adefovir derivatives over those of tenofovir was also noticed. However, no specificity for naturally HPV-transformed cell lines was observed

Sensitivity of human papillomavirus-positive and -negative oropharyngeal cancer cell lines to ionizing irradiation

Human papillomavirus‑positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased in incidence and has a much better prognosis than HPV‑negative (HPV‑) OPSCC with radiotherapy alone, but exactly why is unknown. The present study therefore aimed to further examine the sensitivity and possible changes in gene expression of several HPV+ and HPV‑ OPSCC, including various novel cell lines, upon ionizing irradiation (IR). Previously established HPV+ UM‑SCC‑47, UPCI‑SCC‑90, CU‑OP‑2, CU‑OP‑3 and HPV‑ UM‑SCC‑4, UM‑SCC‑6, UM‑SCC‑74a, UM‑SCC‑19 and newly established CU‑OP‑17 and CU‑OP‑20, characterised here, were subjected to 0‑6 Gy. Surviving fractions of each cell line were tested by clonogenic assays, and irregularities in cell cycle responses were examined by flow cytometry, while changes in gene expression were followed by mRNA sequencing. HPV+ OPSCC cell lines showed greater variation in sensitivity to ionizing irradiation (IR) and tended to be more sensitive than HPV‑ OPSCC cell lines. However, their IR sensitivity was not correlated to the proportion of cells in G2 arrest, and HPV‑ cell lines generally showed lower increases in G2 after IR. Upon IR with 2 Gy, mRNA sequencing revealed an increase in minor HPV integration sites in HPV+ cell lines, and some changes in gene expression in OPSCC cell lines, but not primarily those associated with DNA repair. To conclude, HPV+ OPSCC cell lines showed greater variation in their sensitivity to IR, with some that were radioresistant, but overall the HPV+ OPSCC group still tended to be more sensitive to IR than the HPV‑ OPSCC group. In addition, HPV+ OPSCC lines were more frequently in G2 as compared to HPV‑ cell lines, but the increase in G2 arrest upon IR in HPV+ OPSCC was not correlated to sensitivity to IR. Increases in minor HPV integration sites and changes in gene expression were also demonstrated after irradiation with 2 Gy

Human Papillomavirus DNA methylation predicts response to treatment using cidofovir and imiquimod in Vulval Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3

Purpose: Response rates to treatment of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) with imiquimod and cidofovir are approximately 57% and 61%, respectively. Treatment is associated with significant side effects and, if ineffective, risk of malignant progression. Treatment response is not predicted by clinical factors. Identification of a biomarker that could predict response is an attractive prospect. This work investigated HPV DNA methylation as a potential predictive biomarker in this setting. Experimental Design: DNA from 167 cases of VIN 3 from the RT3 VIN clinical trial was assessed. HPV-positive cases were identified using Greiner PapilloCheck and HPV 16 type-specific PCR. HPV DNA methylation status was assessed in three viral regions: E2, L1/L2, and the promoter, using pyrosequencing. Results: Methylation of the HPV E2 region was associated with response to treatment. For cidofovir (n = 30), median E2 methylation was significantly higher in patients who responded (P ≤ 0.0001); E2 methylation >4% predicted response with 88.2% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity. For imiquimod (n = 33), median E2 methylation was lower in patients who responded to treatment (P = 0.03; not significant after Bonferroni correction); E2 methylation <4% predicted response with 70.6% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity. Conclusions: These data indicate that cidofovir and imiquimod may be effective in two biologically defined groups. HPV E2 DNA methylation demonstrated potential as a predictive biomarker for the treatment of VIN with cidofovir and may warrant investigation in a biomarker-guided clinical trial

Recurrence of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia following treatment with cidofovir or imiquimod: results from a multi-centre, randomised, phase II trial (RT3VIN)

Objective To compare the recurrence rates after complete response to topical treatment with either cidofovir or imiquimod for vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) 3. Design A prospective, open, randomised multicentre trial. Setting 32 general hospitals located in Wales and England. Population or Sample 180 patients were randomised consecutively between 21 October 2009 and 11 January 2013, 89 to cidofoovir (of whom 41 completely responded to treatment) and 91 to imiquimod (of whom 42 completely responded to treatment). Methods After 24 weeks of treatment, complete responders were followed up at 6‐monthly intervals for 24 months. At each visit, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 was assessed and any new lesions were biopsied for histology. Main outcome measures Time to histologically confirmed disease recurrence (any grade of VIN). Results The median length of follow up was 18.4 months. At 18 months, more participants were VIN‐free in the cidofovir arm: 94% (95% CI 78.2–98.5) versus 71.6% (95% CI 52.0–84.3) [univariable hazard ratio (HR) 3.46, 95% CI 0.95–12.60, P = 0.059; multivariable HR 3.53, 95% CI 0.96–12.98, P = 0.057). The number of grade 2+ events was similar between treatment arms (imiquimod: 24/42 (57%) versus cidofovir: 27/41 (66%), χ2 = 0.665, P = 0.415), with no grade 4+. Conclusions Long‐term data indicates a trend towards response being maintained for longer following treatment with cidofovir than with imiquimod, with similar low rates of adverse events for each drug. Adverse event rates indicated acceptable safety of both drugs Tweetable abstract Long‐term follow up in the RT3VIN trial suggests cidofovir may maintain response for longer than imiquimod

Sensitivity to inhibition of DNA repair by Olaparib in novel oropharyngeal cancer cell lines infected with Human Papillomavirus

The incidence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing rapidly in the UK. Patients with HPV-positive OPSCC generally show superior clinical responses relative to HPV-negative patients. We hypothesised that these superior responses could be associated with defective repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB). The study aimed to determine whether defective DNA repair could be associated with sensitivity to inhibition of DNA repair using the PARP inhibitor Olaparib. Sensitivity to Olaparib, and induction and repair of DNA damage, were assessed in a panel of 8 OPSCC cell-lines, including 2 novel HPV-positive lines. Effects on cell cycle distribution and levels of PARP1 and p53 were quantified. RNA-sequencing was used to assess differences in activity of DNA repair pathways. Two HPV-positive OPSCC lines were sensitive to Olaparib at potentially therapeutic doses (0.1–0.5 μM). Two HPV-negative lines were sensitive at an intermediate dose. Four other lines, derived from HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumours, were resistant to PARP inhibition. Only one cell-line, UPCISCC90, showed results consistent with the original hypothesis i.e. that in HPV-positive cells, treatment with Olaparib would cause accumulation of DSB, resulting in cell cycle arrest. There was no evidence that HPV-positive tumours exhibit defective repair of DSB. However, the data suggest that a subset of OPSCC may be susceptible to PARP-inhibitor based therap